Digital Readiness Scorecard · 2026
Arrow Electronics
9 points below the median of 58 across 37 measured distributors
- Index rank
- #10
- Revenue
- $30.9B · FY2025
- Archetype
- Scale Aggregator
- Median attributes
- 31
- Consistency spread
- 20 attrs
- Pages sampled
- 4/5
Scored from 4 product pages sampled across different categories of the public catalog — it characterises the catalog, it does not audit it. The exact pages are listed below, openable. Because this site blocks standard clients, page-level signals were measured in a full browser session on the same sampled pages; the Machine & Agent Readiness pillar is still scored from what a standard client can retrieve.
How to read this score
A score computed from five product pages sampled from Arrow Electronics’s public catalog on 2026-08-06, plus a probe of the site’s robots.txt, sitemap, and server-rendered markup. It is not an audit of the full catalog, and it says nothing about how the business is run — several of the strongest operators in distribution score modestly here. Data passed privately to customers over EDI, punchout, or a syndication feed is not visible to this measurement and does not count toward it.
The four pillars
Scored against the published framework — fourteen signals, no model judgement anywhere in the scoring.
Can a machine tell what this product is and match it to the same product elsewhere?
Does the page answer what a buyer actually asks before they commit?
Can a buyer find out what it costs and whether it ships, without asking a human?
Can a crawler, a marketplace, or an AI shopping agent actually consume any of it?
What the site probe found
Server HTML could not be retrieved by a standard client — bot protection returned no readable page, so no markup was observable either way. Scored as unreadable, not as absent.
Valid sitemap resolved, declared in robots.txt
Product paths are crawlable under the general user-agent rules
Explicitly blocks 7 named AI crawler(s) — a deliberate choice, scored as such
The pages we sampled
Every one, openable. Each was taken from the middle of a different category listing — never a featured or promoted placement — so the sample reflects the catalog rather than its best shelf.
| Product page | Attributes | Images | Page score |
|---|---|---|---|
| www.arrow.com/en/products/g6s212dc/omron | 37 | 1 | 31/69 |
| www.arrow.com/en/products/ca0612mrx7r7bb104/yageo | 31 | 1 | 45/69 |
| www.arrow.com/en/products/1302441203/molex | 17 | 1 | 24.5/69 |
| www.arrow.com/en/products/lpr4150al/stmicroelectronics | 31 | 1 | 29/69 |
Page score is out of 69 — the portion of the framework scored per page. The remaining 31 points are site-level: consistency, gating, and the four agent-readiness signals.
What would move this number
Derived from the score itself, largest gap first — Buyer Answerability lost the most points.
- 1A GTIN or UPC appeared on 0% of the sampled pages. Identifiers are what let a marketplace, a search engine, or a procurement system recognise your listing as the same item everyone else is selling.
- 2Bot protection returned no readable page to a standard browser client, so structured data could not be observed at all. Whatever markup exists behind that wall, a crawler or shopping agent hits the same barrier — which is worth weighing against what the protection is buying.
- 3robots.txt explicitly blocks named AI crawlers. That is a legitimate and deliberate choice, not an error — but it is worth revisiting deliberately rather than by inheritance, because it decides whether your catalog can be cited when a buyer asks an assistant what to buy.
- 4The richest and thinnest pages sampled differed by 20 attributes. A spread that wide usually points at categories onboarded under different rules rather than at any one bad page.
- 5A price was published on 25% of sampled pages. Withholding price is a legitimate commercial strategy, and it is also a hard stop for any automated buyer comparing options.
Show this score
Measured companies are welcome to embed their badge — it links back to this scorecard, which is re-measured each edition, so the number stays live rather than becoming a stale claim.
<a href="https://www.anglera.com/top-distributors-2026/scorecard/arrow-electronics">
<img src="https://www.anglera.com/badges/dri-2026/arrow-electronics.svg"
alt="Anglera Digital Readiness Index 2026: 49/100" height="28" />
</a>Think this is wrong?
Good — that is the useful conversation. The pages we sampled are listed above, so the first thing to do is open them. If the sample missed something, if a category we hit is genuinely unrepresentative, or if your catalog has changed since 2026-08-06, tell us and we re-run the measurement against your live site. Scores are never adjusted by hand — only recomputed.