Each pillar shows the points earned against the maximum that was actually observable. Where a signal could not be observed it is removed from both sides rather than scored as a failure.
| Identity | 5.3 / 6 | |
| Identifiers | 3 / 12 | |
| Attribute depth | 3.6 / 7 |
| Descriptive content | 3.4 / 6 | |
| Imagery | 4.1 / 5 | |
| Ratings and reviews | 4 / 6 | |
| Catalog consistency | 1 / 3 |
| Public pricing | 5 / 5 | |
| Stock visibility | 4 / 4 | |
| Shipping in markup | 0 / 4 | |
| Return policy in markup | 0 / 4 | |
| Un-gated access | 3 / 3 |
| Product markup | 6 / 6 | |
| Required-field completeness | 5 / 5 | |
| Recommended-field depth | 1.9 / 5 | |
| Variant expression | 0 / 4 |
| Crawler access to products | 4 / 4 | |
| AI crawler stance | 3 / 4 | |
| Product sitemap | 4 / 4 | |
| Agent surfaceplatform | 0 / 3 |
We read every sampled page twice — once as a plain crawler reading your published markup, once through an extractor. Where the two disagree, an agent is likely to disagree too.
rating
nothing — everything on the page is also in your markup
6 of 8 compared pages lost at least one identifier in extraction.
| robots.txt readable | yes |
| AI crawler stance | no AI user-agents named (an absent rule permits the crawler) |
| Sitemap | yes, including a product sitemap |
| UCP profile | none at /.well-known/ucp — this is not evidence against adoption |
| llms.txt | none |
Drawn by seeded random selection from your own product sitemap — 47,222 candidate product URLs, seed "anglera-legibility-2026". Same seed, same pages, every time. Open any of them and check our arithmetic.
| Page | Markup | Attributes | Images | GTIN |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| /p/womens-eberjey-gisele-tencel-modal-relaxed-shorts-pj-set/product/9550383 | Product | 12 | 4 | — |
| /p/the-north-face-embroidered-mudder-trucker/product/9835564 | Product | 5 | 2 | — |
| /p/mens-dockers-bowen/product/10028728 | Product | 8 | 7 | — |
| /p/mens-hey-dude-finn-flip/product/10025714 | Product | 8 | 5 | — |
| /p/mens-barbour-classic-beaufort-wax-jacket/product/9949119 | Product | 5 | 5 | — |
| /p/womens-sanctuary-for-keeps-pointelle-tank/product/10064843 | Product | 3 | 5 | — |
| /p/womens-altra-escalante-4/product/9963859 | Product | 8 | 6 | — |
| /p/mens-coach-hybrid-loafer-with-signature/product/10014957 | Product | 6 | 7 | — |
hasVariant an agent sees unrelated products.It is not an audit and not a judgement of the business — it is a 8-page sample taken on a stated date, scored on a published rubric with no model judgement in it. Nothing here predicts whether any assistant will recommend you; for most answer engines that is decided by a private merchant feed we cannot see. If a number here is wrong, tell us and it goes in the public corrections log.
This scorecard is a sample — eight product pages, drawn at random from a published seed. It tells you where Zappos stands, not which SKUs are costing you. We’ll run a real sample of the whole catalog through the same extractor and send back the fields that are missing, by product.
Everything above stays free either way — the rubric, the sampled pages, the dataset, and every other company’s scorecard.