Grocery & Supermarkets · #48 by 2025 U.S. retail sales ($10.63B)
Measured at www.gianteagle.com on 2026-09-01
Each pillar shows the points earned against the maximum that was actually observable. Where a signal could not be observed it is removed from both sides rather than scored as a failure.
| Identity | 5.8 / 6 | |
| Identifiers | 3.3 / 12 | |
| Attribute depth | 2.9 / 7 |
| Descriptive content | 3.1 / 6 | |
| Imagery | 3.4 / 5 | |
| Ratings and reviews | 0 / 6 | |
| Catalog consistency | 2 / 3 |
| Public pricing | 4.8 / 5 | |
| Stock visibility | 2.3 / 4 | |
| Shipping in markup | 0 / 4 | |
| Return policy in markup | 0 / 4 | |
| Un-gated access | 3 / 3 |
| Product markup | 1.5 / 6 | |
| Required-field completeness | 1.3 / 5 | |
| Recommended-field depth | 0.4 / 5 | |
| Variant expression | 0 / 4 |
| Crawler access to products | 4 / 4 | |
| AI crawler stance | 3 / 4 | |
| Product sitemap | 3 / 4 | |
| Agent surfaceplatform | 0 / 3 |
We read every sampled page twice — once as a plain crawler reading your published markup, once through an extractor. Where the two disagree, an agent is likely to disagree too.
nothing lost — your markup survives extraction
nothing — everything on the page is also in your markup
0 of 2 compared pages lost at least one identifier in extraction.
| robots.txt readable | yes |
| AI crawler stance | no AI user-agents named (an absent rule permits the crawler) |
| Sitemap | yes, including a product sitemap |
| UCP profile | none at /.well-known/ucp — this is not evidence against adoption |
| llms.txt | none |
Verified by hand from category listings — products taken from the middle of the list, never featured or best-seller placements. Open any of them and check our arithmetic.
| Page | Markup | Attributes | Images | GTIN |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| /grocery/search/product/00028435600299 | Product | 7 | 5 | — |
| /grocery/search/product/00850073934081 | Product | 5 | 1 | — |
| /grocery/search/product/00030034949723 | other JSON-LD | 6 | 5 | — |
| /grocery/search/product/00894700010137 | other JSON-LD | 7 | 5 | — |
| /grocery/search/product/00016000147348 | other JSON-LD | 3 | 5 | — |
| /grocery/search/product/00028400737401 | other JSON-LD | 1 | 5 | — |
| /grocery/search/product/00299794000000 | other JSON-LD | 6 | 1 | — |
| /grocery/search/product/00013800100665 | other JSON-LD | 8 | 5 | — |
hasVariant an agent sees unrelated products.It is not an audit and not a judgement of the business — it is a 8-page sample taken on a stated date, scored on a published rubric with no model judgement in it. Nothing here predicts whether any assistant will recommend you; for most answer engines that is decided by a private merchant feed we cannot see. If a number here is wrong, tell us and it goes in the public corrections log.
This scorecard is a sample — eight product pages, drawn at random from a published seed. It tells you where Giant Eagle stands, not which SKUs are costing you. We’ll run a real sample of the whole catalog through the same extractor and send back the fields that are missing, by product.
Everything above stays free either way — the rubric, the sampled pages, the dataset, and every other company’s scorecard.